Chickens, slaughtering and dressing · Georgia

Processing Plant - Pine Mountain Valley, GA

Pine Mountain Valley, GA · ~810 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Processing Plant - Pine Mountain Valley, GA runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Chickens, slaughtering and dressing workplace, earning a grade A.

Processing Plant - Pine Mountain Valley, GA: 1.4 TCR = 43% of Chickens, slaughtering and dressing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Processing Plant - Pine Mountain Valley, GA safety composite

Processing Plant - Pine Mountain Valley, GA scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 54%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2019

Processing Plant - Pine Mountain Valley, GA injury rate improved

Processing Plant - Pine Mountain Valley, GA's TCR fell 0.9 from 2.0 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.0 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Pine Mountain Valley, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #13/67
  • PHOTO Koch Foods of AL Kill
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~810 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Koch Foods of AL Kill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Processing Plant - Pine Mountain Valley, GA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Processing Plant - Pine Mountain Valley, GA averages 1.4 TCR (43% of the Chickens, slaughtering and dressing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Processing Plant - Pine Mountain Valley, GA TCR series: 2016=2 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Processing Plant - Pine Mountain Valley, GA falls in its industry

509 Chickens, slaughtering and dre establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 67 Chickens, slaughtering and dre employers in Georgia.

Processing Plant - Pine Mountain Valley, GA (810 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Processing Plant - Pine Mountain Valley, GA
Processing Plant - Pine Mountain Valley, GA (810 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Processing Plant - Pine Mountain Valley, GA has more employees than the Chickens, slaughtering and dressing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.1 0.1 5 5 0
2018 1.1 0.2 7 2 0
2017 1.5 0.7 10 2 0
2016 2.0 0.6 12 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · GA · Pine Mountain Valley

509 Chickens, slaughtering and dressing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 4 employers in Pine Mountain Valley, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Koch Foods of AL Kill 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Butterball - Ozark 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atkins, P-31877 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pilgrims Moorefield PF 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Endeavor Air, Inc. - ATL Flight Operations and Inflight Base 810 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ace Electric Inc. 809 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sysco Atlanta 811 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlanta Sportservice Inc 811 FTE
CITY-NEAR Koch Foods of Pine Mountain Valley 928 FTE
CITY-NEAR QSI Pine Mountain 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valley Pallet and Crating LLC 35 FTE
NAT-TCR National Development of New England 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Building Controls and Services, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA7 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR FLORIDA 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Paragon D&E 810 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nestle Prepared Foods 810 FTE
NAT-SIZE Honeywell IN08 810 FTE
NAT-SIZE CITGO Corporate Headquarters 810 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.