Glycerin (i.e., glycerol), natural, manufacturing · California

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing

Sacramento, CA · ~110 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Glycerin (i.e., glycerol), natural, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing: 0.9 TCR = 27% of Glycerin (i.e., glycerol), natural, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing safety composite

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing: 0.0 → 0.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 1.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing's TCR rose 0.8 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325611 · Sacramento, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/16
  • PHOTO 1st Ayd Building
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~110 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1st Ayd Building (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Procter & Gamble Manufacturing averages 0.9 TCR (27% of the Glycerin (i.e., glycerol), natural, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Procter & Gamble Manufacturing falls in its industry

240 Glycerin (i.e., glycerol), nat establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 16 Glycerin (i.e., glycerol), nat employers in California.

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing (110 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Procter & Gamble Manufacturing
Procter & Gamble Manufacturing (110 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing has fewer employees than the Glycerin (i.e., glycerol), natural, manu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2022 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2021 1.6 0.8 2 0 0
2020 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2019 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325611 · CA · Sacramento

240 Glycerin (i.e., glycerol), natural, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1st Ayd Building 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ecolab Huntington Plant 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raeford 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chemetall 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Queen Victoria Farms, LP 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Ridge Farms 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE GH Dairy - California 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Braga Ranch, Inc. Soledad 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Mobile Mark 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR College of DuPage 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Perham, MN (Arvig) 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilder 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Greer Steel 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rossi Contractors, Inc. 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coty Riverside 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Recycling LLC New Orleans 110 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.