Hand soaps (e.g., hard, liquid, soft) manufacturing · Indiana

Ecolab Huntington Plant

Huntington, IN · ~108 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ecolab Huntington Plant runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Hand soaps (e.g., hard, liquid, soft) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Ecolab Huntington Plant: 0.9 TCR = 26% of Hand soaps (e.g., hard, liquid, soft) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ecolab Huntington Plant safety composite

Ecolab Huntington Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2024

Ecolab Huntington Plant injury rate improved

Ecolab Huntington Plant's TCR fell 1.2 from 2.0 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.0 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325611 · Huntington, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO 1st Ayd Building
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~108 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1st Ayd Building (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Ecolab Huntington Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ecolab Huntington Plant averages 0.9 TCR (26% of the Hand soaps (e.g., hard, liquid, soft) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ecolab Huntington Plant TCR series: 2016=2 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=1 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Ecolab Huntington Plant falls in its industry

240 Hand soaps (e.g., hard, liquid establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Hand soaps (e.g., hard, liquid employers in Indiana.

Ecolab Huntington Plant (108 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ecolab Huntington Plant
Ecolab Huntington Plant (108 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Ecolab Huntington Plant has fewer employees than the Hand soaps (e.g., hard, liquid, soft) ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.4 0.8 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.0 1.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325611 · IN · Huntington

240 Hand soaps (e.g., hard, liquid, soft) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 59 employers in Huntington, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1st Ayd Building 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raeford 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Procter & Gamble Manufacturing 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chemetall Jackson 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer, Worthington - US - Production 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cayuga Generating Station 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE E & B PAVING LLC - Corporate 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Primco, Inc. 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Teijin Automotive Technologies, INC 620 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems 528 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Technologies Electronic Controls, Inc. 461 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC -Huntington 410 FTE
NAT-TCR Springfield Hauling 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR DPL-Centreville 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Charlestown Plant 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Dwyer Company Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Corporate Headquarters 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sealy Container 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medilodge of Okemos 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Browns of Bellport 108 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.