Soaps (e.g., bar, chip, powder) manufacturing · Kansas

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.

Kansas City, KS · ~165 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Soaps (e.g., bar, chip, powder) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.: 0.4 TCR = 13% of Soaps (e.g., bar, chip, powder) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. safety composite

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2018→2024

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. injury rate improved

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.'s TCR fell 1.4 from 1.4 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.4 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325611 · Kansas City, KS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Nice-Pak Prod. Inc. …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~165 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nice-Pak Prod. Inc. / PDI Inc. Distributin Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. averages 0.4 TCR (13% of the Soaps (e.g., bar, chip, powder) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. TCR series: 2018=1.4 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. falls in its industry

240 Soaps (e.g., bar, chip, powder establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Soaps (e.g., bar, chip, powder employers in Kansas.

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. (165 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.
Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. (165 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. has more employees than the Soaps (e.g., bar, chip, powder) manufact median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.8 0.0 2 0 0
2018 1.4 0.7 2 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325611 · KS · Kansas City

240 Soaps (e.g., bar, chip, powder) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 367 employers in Kansas City, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nice-Pak Prod. Inc. / PDI Inc. Distributin Center 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Radienz Living 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Celeste Industries Corporation 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greensboro Blend Plant 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Transcontinental Packaging Lenexa 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Flame Inc. 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE MANHATTAN KS - 3278 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE McAlister Oil, LLC 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MKC6 3,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MKC6 2,912 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairfax Assembly and Stamping 2,772 FTE
CITY-NEAR PROVIDENCE MEDICAL CENTER 1,091 FTE
NAT-TCR Unger Construction 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Networks Electronic Company 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR East Hanover 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Constitution Hall - Dnr 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Extreme Steel Inc. 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Center 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eldercare of Bemidji 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milender White Construction CO 165 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.