Institutional building construction general contractors · California

Unger Construction

Sacramento, CA · ~60 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Unger Construction runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Institutional building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Unger Construction: 0.4 TCR = 15% of Institutional building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Unger Construction safety composite

Unger Construction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2017→2024

Unger Construction injury rate improved

Unger Construction's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.1 · 2019=1.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Sacramento, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/486
  • PHOTO Leonard C. Carnaghi,…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Leonard C. Carnaghi, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Unger Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Unger Construction averages 0.4 TCR (15% of the Institutional building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Unger Construction TCR series: 2017=1.1 · 2019=1.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Unger Construction falls in its industry

4,692 Institutional building constru establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 486 Institutional building constru employers in California.

Unger Construction (60 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Unger Construction
Unger Construction (60 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Unger Construction has more employees than the Institutional building construction gene median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · Sacramento

4,692 Institutional building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Leonard C. Carnaghi, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SDV Main Office 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gilbane Building Company Columbus 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rosch Brothers, Inc. 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Coast Vineyards 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming Cooperative, Inc | Grapes Delano 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paiva Farm Management 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rocket Farms Herbs Inc Thermal 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Constitution Hall - Dnr 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Searcy,AR 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR East Hanover 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Giant Resource Recovery - Attalla, Inc. 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marriott Construction 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE 196 St Johns Town Center 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE 181 Fort Lauderdale 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.