Packaging machinery manufacturing · Alabama

Production Automation Inc. Main Office

Montgomery, AL · ~52 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Production Automation Inc. Main Office runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Packaging machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Production Automation Inc. Main Office: 2.5 TCR = 76% of Packaging machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Production Automation Inc. Main Office safety composite

Production Automation Inc. Main Office scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Production Automation Inc. Main Office: 0.0 → 6.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 6.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2.69× in 2022

Production Automation Inc. Main Office's TCR rose 6.8 from 0.0 in 2018 to 6.8 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 2.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333993 · Montgomery, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 76% of ind

  • DART 6.8 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Milan-Deere Returns
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Milan-Deere Returns (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Production Automation Inc. Main Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Production Automation Inc. Main Office averages 2.5 TCR (76% of the Packaging machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Production Automation Inc. Main Office TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=6.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Production Automation Inc. Main Office falls in its industry

269 Packaging machinery manufactur establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Packaging machinery manufactur employers in Alabama.

Production Automation Inc. Main Office (52 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Production Automation Inc. Main Office
Production Automation Inc. Main Office (52 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Production Automation Inc. Main Office has fewer employees than the Packaging machinery manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.8 6.8 4 0 0
2021 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2020 2.1 0.0 0 1 0
2019 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333993 · AL · Montgomery

269 Packaging machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 420 employers in Montgomery, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Milan-Deere Returns 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pneumatic Scale Angelus - Clearwater 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MBC Aerosol 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fogg Filler Company LLC 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mobile Division Hillcrest 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Birmingham Division Trussville Crew Headquarters 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jasper Complex 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Patton Chapel Crew Headquarters - APC 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC 3,611 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Medical Center South 2,392 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jackson Hospital & Clinic 2,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Montgomery 1,561 FTE
NAT-TCR Best Line Equipment - Shippensburg 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Sweeteners / Batory Foods 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Modern Trailer Sales 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sag Harbor Industries 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 6957-MTJ 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avnet Hoffman Estates USXH 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE SCR-ODFL 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anderson Brothers 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.