Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator · Pennsylvania

Best Line Equipment - Shippensburg

Shippensburg, PA · ~31 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Best Line Equipment - Shippensburg runs at 180% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator workplace, earning a grade D.

Best Line Equipment - Shippensburg: 2.5 TCR = 180% of Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator BLS 1.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Best Line Equipment - Shippensburg safety composite

Best Line Equipment - Shippensburg scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Best Line Equipment - Shippensburg: 0.0 → 6.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 6.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2.66× in 2022

Best Line Equipment - Shippensburg's TCR rose 6.7 from 0.0 in 2019 to 6.7 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 2.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 532412 · Shippensburg, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.5 · 180% of ind

  • DART 6.7 DART
  • RANK #15/30
  • PHOTO 200 - STATE COLLEGE
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 200 - STATE COLLEGE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Best Line Equipment - Shippensburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Best Line Equipment - Shippensburg averages 2.5 TCR (180% of the Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Best Line Equipment - Shippensburg TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=6.7 · BLS 1.4

Where Best Line Equipment - Shippensburg falls in its industry

270 Construction machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 30 Construction machinery and equ employers in Pennsylvania.

Best Line Equipment - Shippensburg (31 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Best Line Equipment - Shippensburg
Best Line Equipment - Shippensburg (31 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Best Line Equipment - Shippensburg has fewer employees than the Construction machinery and equipment ren median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.7 6.7 2 0 0
2021 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

532412 · PA · Shippensburg

270 Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 46 employers in Shippensburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 200 - STATE COLLEGE 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR New-Com, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MacAllister Rental Wixom 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Puckett Rents - Hattiesburg 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spawn Plant 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Caputo & Guest Mushrooms 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE COLSC Cocalico Service Center 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenixville Service Building 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - HGR5 856 FTE
CITY-NEAR Volvo Construction Equipment 774 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schenker Inc. (P&G-Shippensburg) 536 FTE
CITY-NEAR JLG - Shippensburg 512 FTE
NAT-TCR Production Automation Inc. Main Office 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Modern Trailer Sales 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Sweeteners / Batory Foods 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sag Harbor Industries 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Maumee Valley Fabricators, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Green Bay Corporate 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eastern Mechanical Services Inc - Only Branch 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE FPSS 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.