Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe · Ohio

Production Tube Cutting, Inc.

Dayton, OH · ~24 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Production Tube Cutting, Inc. runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe workplace, earning a grade A.

Production Tube Cutting, Inc.: 1.4 TCR = 43% of Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Production Tube Cutting, Inc. safety composite

Production Tube Cutting, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Production Tube Cutting, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Production Tube Cutting, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332996 · Dayton, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/21
  • PHOTO Tubular steel
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tubular steel (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Production Tube Cutting, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Production Tube Cutting, Inc. averages 1.4 TCR (43% of the Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Production Tube Cutting, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Production Tube Cutting, Inc. falls in its industry

337 Pipe fabricating (i.e., bendin establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 21 Pipe fabricating (i.e., bendin employers in Ohio.

Production Tube Cutting, Inc. (24 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Production Tube Cutting, Inc.
Production Tube Cutting, Inc. (24 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Production Tube Cutting, Inc. has fewer employees than the Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.7 4.7 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.6 6.6 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332996 · OH · Dayton

337 Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 599 employers in Dayton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tubular steel 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR VAM USA Ohio 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Fabricating & Cleaning, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR J & J ALLOYS - 501 JJA PEARLAND 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE LCN 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES: Fremont 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMP Fremont Energy Center 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bucyrus Service Center 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miami Valley Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Dayton 5,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dayton Children's Hospital 3,590 FTE
CITY-NEAR CareSource Management Services LLC 3,172 FTE
NAT-TCR Corporate Headquarters 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Iowa City Branch 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant 34 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Grady & Sons Excavation, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lezzer Indiana 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lezzer Pennsdale 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Texas Haul 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aurora Cooperative - Grand Island Feedmill 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.