Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except packaging), manufacturing · New Jersey

Productive Plastics, Inc.

Mt. Laurel, NJ · ~55 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Productive Plastics, Inc. runs at 276% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except packaging), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Productive Plastics, Inc.: 9.1 TCR = 276% of Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except packaging), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Productive Plastics, Inc. safety composite

Productive Plastics, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−28.0

2021→2024

Productive Plastics, Inc. injury rate improved

Productive Plastics, Inc.'s TCR fell 28.0 from 28.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 28.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=28.0 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326113 · Mt. Laurel, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.1 · 276% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/14
  • PHOTO Flex-O-Glass
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Flex-O-Glass (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Productive Plastics, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Productive Plastics, Inc. averages 9.1 TCR (276% of the Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except packaging), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Productive Plastics, Inc. TCR series: 2021=28 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Productive Plastics, Inc. falls in its industry

303 Sheet, plastics, unlaminated ( establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 14 Sheet, plastics, unlaminated ( employers in New Jersey.

Productive Plastics, Inc. (55 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Productive Plastics, Inc.
Productive Plastics, Inc. (55 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Productive Plastics, Inc. has fewer employees than the Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except pac median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.2 3.2 2 0 0
2022 5.2 5.2 3 0 0
2021 28.0 17.8 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326113 · NJ · Mt. Laurel

303 Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except packaging), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 29 employers in Mt. Laurel, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Flex-O-Glass 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR TRM Manufacturing, Inc. 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marshall 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR EFD Madison 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE New Jersey American Water-Farmingdale 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wastewater Treatment Plant 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Moorestown,NJ 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Post Acute Care Pharmacy INT 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rowan College at Burlington County 1,103 FTE
CITY-NEAR Automotive Rentals Inc - Global Headquarters 783 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mt. Laurel - Fellowship Rd 665 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Mt. Laurel 008 514 FTE
NAT-TCR 2877 - Glendale North Shore 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Laurels of Carson City 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Progreso LMMM San Antonio #9, LLC 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 2370 - Orlando SW 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cbtmm 14750 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Little Mountain Precision LLC - Tyler Plant 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1046 - Tullahoma Distribution 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cross Excavation Inc 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.