Surgical supplies (except medical instruments) manufacturing · Massachusetts

Allen Medical Systems, Inc.

Acton, MA · ~145 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Allen Medical Systems, Inc. runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Surgical supplies (except medical instruments) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Allen Medical Systems, Inc.: 0.8 TCR = 26% of Surgical supplies (except medical instruments) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Allen Medical Systems, Inc. safety composite

Allen Medical Systems, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Allen Medical Systems, Inc.: 0.7 → 1.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 1.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2019

Allen Medical Systems, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.6 from 0.7 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339113 · Acton, MA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/38
  • PHOTO Avery Dennison Medical
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~145 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Avery Dennison Medical (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Allen Medical Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Allen Medical Systems, Inc. averages 0.8 TCR (26% of the Surgical supplies (except medical instruments) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Allen Medical Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0.7 · 2017=0.6 · 2019=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Allen Medical Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

555 Surgical supplies (except medi establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 38 Surgical supplies (except medi employers in Massachusetts.

Allen Medical Systems, Inc. (145 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Allen Medical Systems, Inc.
Allen Medical Systems, Inc. (145 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Allen Medical Systems, Inc. has more employees than the Surgical supplies (except medical instru median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.3 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2016 0.7 0.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339113 · MA · Acton

555 Surgical supplies (except medical instruments) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 31 employers in Acton, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Avery Dennison Medical 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stryker- Hyperbranch 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ArmorSource, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR DePuy Synthes Development Ctr West Chester 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Insa Easthampton 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gladding Hearn Shipbuilding 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2679 SOUTH BAYBOSTON 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-1858 145 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hayward Road 409 FTE
CITY-NEAR ROCHE BROS - ACTON 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR Roche Bros. Supermarkets - Acton 192 FTE
CITY-NEAR Life Care Center of Acton 170 FTE
NAT-TCR Program All Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR IMI Precison Engineering 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 550 Kirkland Way 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-MD/PA District : SVC-Baltimore MD-USA 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE GREX 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boynton Health Care Center 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE 110 - Ft. Wayne West 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE 178 - Schaumburg West 145 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.