Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats · Texas

Progreso LMMM Houston# 21, LLC

Houston, TX · ~21 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.8
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Progreso LMMM Houston# 21, LLC runs at 554% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats workplace, earning a grade F.

Progreso LMMM Houston# 21, LLC: 18.8 TCR = 554% of Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats BLS 3.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Progreso LMMM Houston# 21, LLC safety composite

Progreso LMMM Houston# 21, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 18.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−56.0

2017→2018

Progreso LMMM Houston# 21, LLC injury rate improved

Progreso LMMM Houston# 21, LLC's TCR fell 56.0 from 74.8 in 2017 to 18.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 74.8 TCR. In 2018, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=74.8 · 2018=18.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445110 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.8 · 554% of ind

  • DART 18.8 DART
  • RANK #1881/1899
  • PHOTO Trader Joe's 0006 Sa…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Trader Joe's 0006 Santa Monica (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Progreso LMMM Houston# 21, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Progreso LMMM Houston# 21, LLC averages 18.8 TCR (554% of the Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Progreso LMMM Houston# 21, LLC TCR series: 2017=74.8 · 2018=18.8 · BLS 3.4

Where Progreso LMMM Houston# 21, LLC falls in its industry

30,654 Delicatessens primarily retail establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1881 safest of 1899 Delicatessens primarily retail employers in Texas.

Progreso LMMM Houston# 21, LLC (21 employees, TCR 18.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Progreso LMMM Houston# 21, LLC
Progreso LMMM Houston# 21, LLC (21 employees, TCR 18.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Progreso LMMM Houston# 21, LLC has fewer employees than the Delicatessens primarily retailing a rang median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 18.8 18.8 3 0 0
2017 74.8 74.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445110 · TX · Houston

30,654 Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Trader Joe's 0006 Santa Monica 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ontario #147 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-01895 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trader Joe's 0032 Pasadena 18.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grass Roots Farming LLC. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dawn Cattle Feeders 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Twin Lakes Dairy LP 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEABOARD FOODS LP TEXAS MAINT 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Provident Village at Creekside 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodbriar 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-01895 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Biloxi 18.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE DBi Osceola 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Membership 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Curtiss-Wright Surface Technology 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fluoresco Services Tucson Branch 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.