Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · Michigan

Progressive Residential Services of New Mexico

Bloomfield Hills, MI · ~533 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Progressive Residential Services of New Mexico runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade C.

Progressive Residential Services of New Mexico: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Progressive Residential Services of New Mexico safety composite

Progressive Residential Services of New Mexico scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Progressive Residential Services of New Mexico held a steady TCR band

Progressive Residential Services of New Mexico's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.0 TCR.

2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Bloomfield Hills, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/29
  • PHOTO Wallkill IRA
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~533 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wallkill IRA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Progressive Residential Services of New Mexico in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Progressive Residential Services of New Mexico averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Progressive Residential Services of New Mexico TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Progressive Residential Services of New Mexico falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 29 Group homes, intellectual and employers in Michigan.

Progressive Residential Services of New Mexico (533 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Progressive Residential Services of New Mexico
Progressive Residential Services of New Mexico (533 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Progressive Residential Services of New Mexico has more employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · MI · Bloomfield Hills

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 59 employers in Bloomfield Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wallkill IRA 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Services For Young Adults 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Young Adult Services 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR East 170th Residence 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Aristeo Construction 533 FTE
STATE-SIZE Extang 533 FTE
STATE-SIZE 635 VHS REHAB INST OF MICHIGAN INC 533 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rivian Automotive, Inc. - Plymouth 532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Super C Group LLC dba Alline Salon Group 1,808 FTE
CITY-NEAR Progressive Residential Services of Michigan 355 FTE
CITY-NEAR Quality South Inc 236 FTE
CITY-NEAR SKLD Bloomfield Hills 233 FTE
NAT-TCR EPIC Tampa 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pitman Glass Company 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TXC101551 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Westell Inc Aurora 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 105185 - IPP Repowering- 840MW 2x2x1 CC 533 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakeview Village 533 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coherent Corp. 533 FTE
NAT-SIZE Denver Center for the Performing Arts 533 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.