Residential property managing · California

Project Management Inc.

Sacramento, CA · ~72 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.9
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Project Management Inc. runs at 776% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Residential property managing workplace, earning a grade F.

Project Management Inc.: 10.9 TCR = 776% of Residential property managing BLS 1.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Project Management Inc. safety composite

Project Management Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Project Management Inc.: 13.8 → 14.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 14.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.35× in 2024

Project Management Inc.'s TCR rose 0.9 from 13.8 in 2022 to 14.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531311 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.9 · 776% of ind

  • DART 14.7 DART
  • RANK #42/47
  • PHOTO Corporate Office - A…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Corporate Office - Amusement industry Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Project Management Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Project Management Inc. averages 10.9 TCR (776% of the Residential property managing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Project Management Inc. TCR series: 2022=13.8 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=14.7 · BLS 1.4

Where Project Management Inc. falls in its industry

500 Residential property managing establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 47 Residential property managing employers in California.

Project Management Inc. (72 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Project Management Inc.
Project Management Inc. (72 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Project Management Inc. has more employees than the Residential property managing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.7 14.7 9 2 0
2023 4.1 4.1 3 0 0
2022 13.8 9.2 7 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531311 · CA · Sacramento

500 Residential property managing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Corporate Office - Amusement industry Inc 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CPMC, Inc. dba Westhome Property Management 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solaire Corporate (West) - Las Vegas Residential Properties 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Actlien Property Management LLC 11.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monterey Pacific, LLC 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arts Ranch 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mellano & Company - Los Angeles Wholesale House 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greg Hooker dba Diamond H Dairy 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Home Delivery Giant Company Lancaster Pa 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR POSC operating out of the HealthPlex 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Belvidere Fire Department 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Granite Gate Senior Living 10.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tooele UT DI 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE W.L. Roenigk, Inc. - Natrona Heights 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Instrumentation & Control Systems Engineering, Inc 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kombi Ltd. 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.