Blood pressure apparatus manufacturing · California

ProSomnus Sleep Technologies

Name: ProSomnus Sleep Technologies Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Pleasanton, CA · ~71 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 3.4
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ProSomnus Sleep Technologies runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Blood pressure apparatus manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

ProSomnus Sleep Technologies: 3.4 TCR = 102% of Blood pressure apparatus manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ProSomnus Sleep Technologies safety composite

ProSomnus Sleep Technologies scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 3.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.5

2018→2020

ProSomnus Sleep Technologies injury rate improved

ProSomnus Sleep Technologies's TCR fell 7.5 from 7.5 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=7.5 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339112 · Pleasanton, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 102% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #92/107
PHOTO Integra Anasco
BOOK 3y book
INJ 7 inj
SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Integra Anasco (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

This site

3.4
Integra Anasco

3.4
5580 S. Nogale

3.4
Depuy Synthes

3.4
Kelcourt Plast

3.3

What this shows ProSomnus Sleep Technologies averages 3.4 TCR (102% of the Blood pressure apparatus manufacturing BLS benchmark).

ProSomnus Sleep Technologies TCR series: 2018=7.5 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where ProSomnus Sleep Technologies falls in its industry

741 Blood pressure apparatus manuf establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #92 safest of 107 Blood pressure apparatus manuf employers in California.

ProSomnus Sleep Technologies (71 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5

ProSomnus Sleep Technologies has fewer employees than the Blood pressure apparatus manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2020	0.0	0.0	0
2019	2.5	2.5	2
2018	7.5	4.5	5

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339112 · CA · Pleasanton

741 Blood pressure apparatus manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 169 employers in Pleasanton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Integra Anasco	ANASCO, PR	3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	5580 S. Nogales Hwy.	TUCSON, AZ	3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Depuy Synthes Bridgewater	BRIDGEWATER, MA	3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Kelcourt Plastics	NOGALES, AZ	3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	M Pineda Farming Co	BAKERSFIELD	71 FTE
STATE-SIZE	AgSource Services, LLC	VISALIA	71 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Schafer Ranch, Inc	MADERA	71 FTE
STATE-SIZE	R & J Dondero Inc	LINDEN	71 FTE
CITY-NEAR	California Department of Transportation Facility 138	Pleasanton	2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR	California Department of Transportation Facility 624	Pleasanton	2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Pleasanton Campus	Pleasanton	1,561 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Sciens Building Solutions LLC	Pleasanton	1,472 FTE
NAT-TCR	Foremost Farms - Richland Center	Richland Center, WI	3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	Fort Hood, TX	Fort Hood, TX	3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	Americom Technology, Inc.	West Valley City, UT	3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	Boulder Service Center	Boulder, CO	3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Munn Enterprises, Inc	Hattiesburg, MS	71 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Middlebury Center, PA	Middlebury Center, PA	71 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Saint Gobain Huntsville	Huntsville, AL	71 FTE
NAT-SIZE	RLC Hillsboro	Hillsboro, OR	71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.