Airport baggage handling services · Texas

Prospect Airport Services AUS

Austin, TX · ~91 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prospect Airport Services AUS runs at 162% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Airport baggage handling services workplace, earning a grade D.

Prospect Airport Services AUS: 7.3 TCR = 162% of Airport baggage handling services BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prospect Airport Services AUS safety composite

Prospect Airport Services AUS scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2016→2024

Prospect Airport Services AUS injury rate improved

Prospect Airport Services AUS's TCR fell 4.4 from 10.0 in 2016 to 5.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 14.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.0 · 2017=14.3 · 2018=9.0 · 2019=12.4 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=5.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Austin, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.3 · 162% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #103/126
  • PHOTO AGI MIA
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AGI MIA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Prospect Airport Services AUS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prospect Airport Services AUS averages 7.3 TCR (162% of the Airport baggage handling services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prospect Airport Services AUS TCR series: 2016=10 · 2017=14.3 · 2018=9 · 2019=12.4 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=5.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Prospect Airport Services AUS falls in its industry

1,555 Airport baggage handling servi establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #103 safest of 126 Airport baggage handling servi employers in Texas.

Prospect Airport Services AUS (91 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Prospect Airport Services AUS
Prospect Airport Services AUS (91 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Prospect Airport Services AUS has more employees than the Airport baggage handling services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.6 2.5 9 0 0
2023 4.5 3.7 6 0 0
2022 5.6 5.6 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.3 4.3 0 1 0
2019 12.4 7.7 8 0 0
2018 9.0 6.0 6 0 0
2017 14.3 12.5 6 2 0
2016 10.0 1.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · TX · Austin

1,555 Airport baggage handling services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AGI MIA 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilmington International Airport 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SFO-SCS3 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Swissport Ground Handling - IAD - IAD-GHA 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE South Texas Oilfield Solutions, LLC 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quadvest LP 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - North Central Texas 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Leyendecker Builders & Contractors, Inc. 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Victorian Village 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR C.L. Linfoot Co 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Breitinger Company 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Altru South Washington Campus 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Park Health 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Old Dominion Electric Cooperative 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE LP Monteagle, LLC 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE 58LR 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.