Airport baggage handling services · New Jersey

Prospect Airport Services EWR UA

Newark, NJ · ~644 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prospect Airport Services EWR UA runs at 180% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Airport baggage handling services workplace, earning a grade D.

Prospect Airport Services EWR UA: 8.1 TCR = 180% of Airport baggage handling services BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prospect Airport Services EWR UA safety composite

Prospect Airport Services EWR UA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−46.9

2019→2024

Prospect Airport Services EWR UA injury rate improved

Prospect Airport Services EWR UA's TCR fell 46.9 from 51.9 in 2019 to 5.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 51.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=51.9 · 2020=9.3 · 2021=13.0 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=6.4 · 2024=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Newark, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.1 · 180% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #36/43
  • PHOTO ONT California Airport
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 203 inj
  • SIZE ~644 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ONT California Airport (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Prospect Airport Services EWR UA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prospect Airport Services EWR UA averages 8.1 TCR (180% of the Airport baggage handling services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prospect Airport Services EWR UA TCR series: 2019=51.9 · 2020=9.3 · 2021=13 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=6.4 · 2024=5 · BLS 4.5

Where Prospect Airport Services EWR UA falls in its industry

1,555 Airport baggage handling servi establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 43 Airport baggage handling servi employers in New Jersey.

Prospect Airport Services EWR UA (644 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Prospect Airport Services EWR UA
Prospect Airport Services EWR UA (644 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Prospect Airport Services EWR UA has more employees than the Airport baggage handling services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 4.0 35 5 0
2023 6.4 6.4 45 3 0
2022 6.6 6.5 39 0 0
2021 13.0 6.0 44 2 0
2020 9.3 4.5 31 2 0
2019 51.9 17.3 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · NJ · Newark

1,555 Airport baggage handling services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 356 employers in Newark, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ONT California Airport 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSP088 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4765-MEMCX0DHL 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unifi Aviation Services : JAC - Jackson, WY 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE LG Electronics USA Inc - Englewood Cliffs, NJ 644 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - ACY5 644 FTE
STATE-SIZE 010 - BORDENTOWN, NJ 643 FTE
STATE-SIZE TRENTON_1441025 645 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR EWR 13,545 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR - Airport United Airlines Offices 13,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-EWR 11,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWRPW9829 EWR - NON AA PAX SER 4,772 FTE
NAT-TCR Ventura County Probation Agency 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Willmar 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bio Town Ag, Inc. 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR New England Union Co. 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kysor Warren/EPTA 644 FTE
NAT-SIZE Procter and Gamble Paper Products Company Albany Plant 644 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sargent Electric Company 644 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vegas Kewadin Casino 644 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.