Electrical contractors · Pennsylvania

Sargent Electric Company

Pittsburgh, PA · ~644 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sargent Electric Company runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electrical contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Sargent Electric Company: 1.0 TCR = 35% of Electrical contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sargent Electric Company safety composite

Sargent Electric Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2017→2024

Sargent Electric Company injury rate improved

Sargent Electric Company's TCR fell 0.5 from 1.4 in 2017 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.4 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #30/191
  • PHOTO Orlando Diefenderfer…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 56 inj
  • SIZE ~644 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Orlando Diefenderfer Electrical Contractors Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Sargent Electric Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sargent Electric Company averages 1.0 TCR (35% of the Electrical contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sargent Electric Company TCR series: 2017=1.4 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=1 · BLS 2.8

Where Sargent Electric Company falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical contractors establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 191 Electrical contractors employers in Pennsylvania.

Sargent Electric Company (644 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sargent Electric Company
Sargent Electric Company (644 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Sargent Electric Company has more employees than the Electrical contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.3 10 0 0
2023 1.1 0.5 10 0 0
2022 0.9 0.0 7 0 0
2021 1.4 0.3 10 0 0
2020 0.4 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.8 0.5 5 0 0
2018 0.7 0.5 4 0 0
2017 1.4 0.4 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · PA · Pittsburgh

4,550 Electrical contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Orlando Diefenderfer Electrical Contractors Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tekline Electrical Services 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Payne Electric Co., Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Electric, Inc. 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA King of Prussia Geerdes (4055) 643 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lancaster West 642 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - PHL5 647 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Station 648 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Kawasaki Rail Car Inc - Greenbelt 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meyer Contracting Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CFFV 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Enginuity Communications Corporation 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vegas Kewadin Casino 644 FTE
NAT-SIZE Procter and Gamble Paper Products Company Albany Plant 644 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prospect Airport Services EWR UA 644 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kysor Warren/EPTA 644 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.