Airport baggage handling services · Utah

Prospect Airport Services SLC

Salt Lake City, UT · ~260 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prospect Airport Services SLC runs at 172% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Airport baggage handling services workplace, earning a grade D.

Prospect Airport Services SLC: 7.7 TCR = 172% of Airport baggage handling services BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prospect Airport Services SLC safety composite

Prospect Airport Services SLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Prospect Airport Services SLC: 1.9 → 8.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 9.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.72× in 2024

Prospect Airport Services SLC's TCR rose 6.5 from 1.9 in 2017 to 8.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 9.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Salt Lake City, UT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.7 · 172% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #14/16
  • PHOTO TREGO/DUGAN AVIATION…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 104 inj
  • SIZE ~260 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TREGO/DUGAN AVIATION, INC PIT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Prospect Airport Services SLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prospect Airport Services SLC averages 7.7 TCR (172% of the Airport baggage handling services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prospect Airport Services SLC TCR series: 2017=1.9 · 2018=8.8 · 2019=8.3 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=9.1 · 2022=9.6 · 2023=9.6 · 2024=8.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Prospect Airport Services SLC falls in its industry

1,555 Airport baggage handling servi establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 16 Airport baggage handling servi employers in Utah.

Prospect Airport Services SLC (260 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Prospect Airport Services SLC
Prospect Airport Services SLC (260 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Prospect Airport Services SLC has more employees than the Airport baggage handling services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.4 5.6 20 1 0
2023 9.6 8.0 22 2 0
2022 9.6 8.1 19 0 0
2021 9.1 9.1 13 0 0
2020 6.1 6.1 4 0 0
2019 8.3 4.2 10 0 0
2018 8.8 7.3 11 1 0
2017 1.9 1.2 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · UT · Salt Lake City

1,555 Airport baggage handling services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 998 employers in Salt Lake City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TREGO/DUGAN AVIATION, INC PIT 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sheltair Aviation LAL 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unifi Aviation Services : ABR - Aberdeen 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MIA-SCS 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE LOCATION 54003 260 FTE
STATE-SIZE MADDOX RANCH HOUSE 260 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steel Encounters 261 FTE
STATE-SIZE OSI Group 259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - SLC 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PC - Primary Childrens Hospital 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Technologies, Inc. 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salt Lake City Terminal 2,766 FTE
NAT-TCR Shoei Foods USA, Inc. 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR PDQ Rentals Santa Fe Springs 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR New York Mills Public School 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakeshore Glass & Metals, LLC 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Riverside Pouring Plant 260 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minnesota Department of Transportation District Two 260 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Bernardino 260 FTE
NAT-SIZE Merchants Financial Group, Inc. 260 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.