Passenger air transportation, scheduled · California

Prospect International Airport Services

San Francisco, CA · ~304 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prospect International Airport Services runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Passenger air transportation, scheduled workplace, earning a grade C.

Prospect International Airport Services: 3.8 TCR = 83% of Passenger air transportation, scheduled BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prospect International Airport Services safety composite

Prospect International Airport Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Prospect International Airport Services: 1.4 → 6.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 6.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.17× in 2018

Prospect International Airport Services's TCR rose 4.8 from 1.4 in 2017 to 6.1 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 83% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #42/177
  • PHOTO Spirit Airlines - LAS
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~304 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spirit Airlines - LAS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Prospect International Airport Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prospect International Airport Services averages 3.8 TCR (83% of the Passenger air transportation, scheduled BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prospect International Airport Services TCR series: 2017=1.4 · 2018=6.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Prospect International Airport Services falls in its industry

1,568 Passenger air transportation, establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 177 Passenger air transportation, employers in California.

Prospect International Airport Services (304 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Prospect International Airport Services
Prospect International Airport Services (304 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Prospect International Airport Services has more employees than the Passenger air transportation, scheduled median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 6.1 4.4 13 1 0
2017 1.4 0.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · CA · San Francisco

1,568 Passenger air transportation, scheduled employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spirit Airlines - LAS 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SW-20730022-CS COS - COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-PD-LYH-LYNCHBURG-PD 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SW-20730038-CS HLN - HELENA, MT 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Metro Construction - Bld: 5356 - 01 304 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kitchell CEM, Inc. 304 FTE
STATE-SIZE Leprino Foods Lemoore East 304 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALSICO HI TEC 304 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Thornley's Service Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR A-Stamp Industries 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Jackson Emc - Jefferson 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Liberty Residential - 870 Old Trail Rd. 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Structurepoint: Headquarters 304 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dean - Toledo (Suiza) 304 FTE
NAT-SIZE CN Caguas 304 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metropark Facility 304 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.