Parks and recreation commission, government · Connecticut

Prospect Park and Recreation

Name: Prospect Park and Recreation Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Prospect, CT · ~39 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 0.0
Avg TCR: 3.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prospect Park and Recreation runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Parks and recreation commission, government workplace, earning a grade C.

Prospect Park and Recreation: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Parks and recreation commission, government BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prospect Park and Recreation safety composite

Prospect Park and Recreation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Prospect Park and Recreation held a steady TCR band

Prospect Park and Recreation's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.0 TCR.

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Prospect, CT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #0/28
PHOTO City of Fremont - Co…
BOOK 4y book
INJ 0 inj
SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Fremont - Community Support Includes Recreation and Human Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

City of Clive

0.1
Carroll Commun

0.1
Stevenson Comm

0.1
This site

0
City of Fremon

0

What this shows Prospect Park and Recreation averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Parks and recreation commission, government BLS benchmark).

Prospect Park and Recreation TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Prospect Park and Recreation falls in its industry

413 Parks and recreation commissio establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 28 Parks and recreation commissio employers in Connecticut.

Prospect Park and Recreation (39 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Prospect Park and Recreation has fewer employees than the Parks and recreation commission, governm median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2020	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2019	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2018	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2017	0.0	0.0	0	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · CT · Prospect

413 Parks and recreation commission, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 13 employers in Prospect, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	City of Fremont - Community Support Includes Recreation and Human Services	FREMONT, CA. 94537, CA	0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	City of Clive Aquatic Center	CLIVE, IA	0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Carroll Community Center	OAK PARK, IL	0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Stevenson Community Center	OAK PARK, IL	0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Water pollution control authority	STAMFORD	39 FTE
STATE-SIZE	AJ WASTE SYSTEMS LLC	CHESHIRE	39 FTE
STATE-SIZE	yrc	NEW HAVEN	39 FTE
STATE-SIZE	CEF CT	MIDDLETOWN	39 FTE
CITY-NEAR	All-Star-Prospect	Prospect	77 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Prospect Volunteer Fire Department EMT	Prospect	72 FTE
CITY-NEAR	163515-Prospect \| CT \| 163515	Prospect	71 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Sheldon Precision, LLC	Prospect	53 FTE
NAT-TCR	Meijer 208	Lincoln Park, MI	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Atlanta - Phipps	Atlanta, GA	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Binghamton	Endwell, NY	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Detroit	Taylor, MI	0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Grace Woods Niles	Niles, OH	39 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Cargill Animal Nutrition	Kissimmee, FL	39 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Tuckerton Lumber Company	Surf City, NJ	39 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Point Dedicated Mission	Mission, TX	39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.