Supports, orthopedic (e.g., abdominal, ankle, arch, kneecap), manufacturing · Connecticut

Proterial Cable America, Inc. CT

North Stonington, CT · ~32 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Proterial Cable America, Inc. CT runs at 430% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Supports, orthopedic (e.g., abdominal, ankle, arch, kneecap), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Proterial Cable America, Inc. CT: 14.2 TCR = 430% of Supports, orthopedic (e.g., abdominal, ankle, arch, kneecap), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Proterial Cable America, Inc. CT safety composite

Proterial Cable America, Inc. CT scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.1

2023→2024

Proterial Cable America, Inc. CT injury rate improved

Proterial Cable America, Inc. CT's TCR fell 10.1 from 19.2 in 2023 to 9.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 19.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=19.2 · 2024=9.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339113 · North Stonington, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.2 · 430% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #11/11
  • PHOTO CSC 3004
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CSC 3004 (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Proterial Cable America, Inc. CT in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Proterial Cable America, Inc. CT averages 14.2 TCR (430% of the Supports, orthopedic (e.g., abdominal, ankle, arch, kneecap), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Proterial Cable America, Inc. CT TCR series: 2023=19.2 · 2024=9.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Proterial Cable America, Inc. CT falls in its industry

555 Supports, orthopedic (e.g., ab establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 11 Supports, orthopedic (e.g., ab employers in Connecticut.

Proterial Cable America, Inc. CT (32 employees, TCR 14.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Proterial Cable America, Inc. CT
Proterial Cable America, Inc. CT (32 employees, TCR 14.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Proterial Cable America, Inc. CT has fewer employees than the Supports, orthopedic (e.g., abdominal, a median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.1 6.1 3 0 0
2023 19.2 9.6 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339113 · CT · North Stonington

555 Supports, orthopedic (e.g., abdominal, ankle, arch, kneecap), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 7 employers in North Stonington, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CSC 3004 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SWR205 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alpha Protech 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Service 5204 12.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Montville Power LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jacobs - WATERBURY - OMI 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE John Moriarty & Associates, Inc. (CT) 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Bridge Company - 422110 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Stonington 498 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-41340000-4134 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-279 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Cooper Group LLC 41 FTE
NAT-TCR CITE Armored Holly Springs 14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Big R of Dodge City, LLC. 14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Nenor - Norfolk 14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DTU8 14.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE WSM - Kansas City 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ditzfeld Transfer, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Windows Plus Construction Inc 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE The ICEE Company - NEW YORK 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.