Gas generating machinery, general purpose-type, manufacturing · Connecticut

Proton Energy Systems, Inc.

Wallingford, CT · ~116 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Proton Energy Systems, Inc. runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gas generating machinery, general purpose-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Proton Energy Systems, Inc.: 1.2 TCR = 35% of Gas generating machinery, general purpose-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Proton Energy Systems, Inc. safety composite

Proton Energy Systems, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Proton Energy Systems, Inc.: 0.0 → 1.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.59× in 2024

Proton Energy Systems, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.4 from 0.0 in 2017 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333999 · Wallingford, CT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO ATS Assembly & Test …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ATS Assembly & Test Wixom (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Proton Energy Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Proton Energy Systems, Inc. averages 1.2 TCR (35% of the Gas generating machinery, general purpose-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Proton Energy Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=1.1 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Proton Energy Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

242 Gas generating machinery, gene establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Gas generating machinery, gene employers in Connecticut.

Proton Energy Systems, Inc. (116 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Proton Energy Systems, Inc.
Proton Energy Systems, Inc. (116 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Proton Energy Systems, Inc. has more employees than the Gas generating machinery, general purpos median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 0.7 2 0 0
2023 2.8 2.1 4 0 0
2022 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.2 0.0 2 0 0
2018 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333999 · CT · Wallingford

242 Gas generating machinery, general purpose-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 136 employers in Wallingford, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ATS Assembly & Test Wixom 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Setpoint Systems 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tridim Filter Allentown PA 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SMHT 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Conn Acoustics, Inc. 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Orafol Avon CT 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE INFRA-METALS CO - CT 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Y Foods, Inc. Avon 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : BDL5 1,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaylord Hopital 986 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BDL5 956 FTE
CITY-NEAR DDS South Region 606 FTE
NAT-TCR Las Vegas Sphere 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cleveland Cliffs Zanesville Works 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Nestle 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Mexichem Specialty Resins 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Michels Pacific Energy, Inc- CA- San Diego 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE W M Schlosser Company Inc 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Digital Room LLC - Salt Lake City 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bloomington Fire Department 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.