Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Minnesota

ProWorks

Litchfield, MN · ~102 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ProWorks runs at 187% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade D.

ProWorks: 7.1 TCR = 187% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ProWorks safety composite

ProWorks scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2017→2023

ProWorks injury rate improved

ProWorks's TCR fell 4.5 from 11.2 in 2017 to 6.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.2 · 2021=3.4 · 2023=6.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Litchfield, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.1 · 187% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #30/44
  • PHOTO Social Vocational Se…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Social Vocational Services #339 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

ProWorks in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ProWorks averages 7.1 TCR (187% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ProWorks TCR series: 2017=11.2 · 2021=3.4 · 2023=6.7 · BLS 3.8

Where ProWorks falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 44 Activity centers for disabled employers in Minnesota.

ProWorks (102 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ProWorks
ProWorks (102 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

ProWorks has more employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.7 3.4 2 0 0
2021 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2017 11.2 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · MN · Litchfield

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 48 employers in Litchfield, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Social Vocational Services #339 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lifesprk, LLC (Community & Corp) 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BIOS CORPORATE OFFICE 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Day Hab Main St. 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Highmark Companies 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minger Construction Co., Inc. 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE US121: Minneapolis 337 - SG 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Earth MN 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Litchfield ISD #465 358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Litchfield, MN 332 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bobcat Doosan Litchfield 293 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4374 214 FTE
NAT-TCR The Daniel Co. of Springfield 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Timothy Place NFP - Park Place of Elmhurst 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dimondale Nursing and Rehab 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Southland Truck Group, LLC - Harahan 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 24M Technologies Inc. 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMSWillowbrook 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Refco Farms LLC 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gainey's Concrete Products 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.