Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · New York

Day Hab Main St.

Buffalo, NY · ~70 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Day Hab Main St. runs at 186% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Day Hab Main St.: 7.1 TCR = 186% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Day Hab Main St. safety composite

Day Hab Main St. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Day Hab Main St.: 3.7 → 17.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 17.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.96× in 2024

Day Hab Main St.'s TCR rose 13.3 from 3.7 in 2020 to 17.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Buffalo, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.1 · 186% of ind

  • DART 6.8 DART
  • RANK #110/158
  • PHOTO Machias
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Machias (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Day Hab Main St. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Day Hab Main St. averages 7.1 TCR (186% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Day Hab Main St. TCR series: 2020=3.7 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=17 · BLS 3.8

Where Day Hab Main St. falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #110 safest of 158 Activity centers for disabled employers in New York.

Day Hab Main St. (70 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Day Hab Main St.
Day Hab Main St. (70 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Day Hab Main St. has fewer employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 17.0 6.8 10 0 0
2023 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2022 4.8 2.4 1 1 0
2021 7.2 3.6 2 0 0
2020 3.7 3.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · NY · Buffalo

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 532 employers in Buffalo, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Machias 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BIOS CORPORATE OFFICE 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Catalyst - Imperial Valley 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ProWorks 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Samascott Orchards LLC 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Westchester 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE El Sol Contracting/El Sol Ltd. Ent. JV 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Callahan Paving Corp. 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buffalo General Hospital 3,556 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Hospital of Buffalo 2,379 FTE
CITY-NEAR WNY Independent Living, Inc. 1,988 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kaleida Health Oishei Childrens Hospital 1,765 FTE
NAT-TCR Yuma Regional Medical Center 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Architectural Sheet Metal, LLC 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 007/Houston 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Jay Randolph Developmental Services, INC 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atlas Tag & Label 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Watermark at Beverly Hills 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indianapolis IN Millwork 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0282 Phoenix 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.