Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire · Rhode Island

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC

Lincoln, RI · ~158 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire workplace, earning a grade C.

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC: 3.1 TCR = 95% of Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC safety composite

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2022→2023

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC injury rate improved

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC's TCR fell 1.6 from 4.0 in 2022 to 2.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.0 · 2023=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335929 · Lincoln, RI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 95% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Prysmian Group - Mar…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~158 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Prysmian Group - Marion Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Rhode Island employers → · Look up another →

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC averages 3.1 TCR (95% of the Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC TCR series: 2022=4 · 2023=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC falls in its industry

144 Cable, nonferrous, insulated, establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Rhode Island alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Cable, nonferrous, insulated, employers in Rhode Island.

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC (158 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC
Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC (158 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC has more employees than the Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.3 1.2 3 1 0
2022 4.0 2.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335929 · RI · Lincoln

144 Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,610 rated employers in Rhode Island with headcount on file · 59 employers in Lincoln, RI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Prysmian Group - Marion Plant 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orangeburg - Cable Plant 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR US056B: ACS Unit 1 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Draka Cableteq USA 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Providence 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-1197 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-2397 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lincolnwood Operator 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR Twin River Casino 1,719 FTE
CITY-NEAR Twin River Casino & Hotel 1,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Construction 548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Calise & Sons Bakery 287 FTE
NAT-TCR Omni Austin Hotel Downtown 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Memorial Health System Main Campus 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Tuff Boy Sales, Inc 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Consolidated Electrical Distributors (Pc8037) 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fontana #033 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moreno Valley #046 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gresham #047 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aerospace : Mentor 158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.