Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire · Indiana

Prysmian Group - Marion Plant

Marion, IN · ~158 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prysmian Group - Marion Plant runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire workplace, earning a grade C.

Prysmian Group - Marion Plant: 3.1 TCR = 95% of Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prysmian Group - Marion Plant safety composite

Prysmian Group - Marion Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Prysmian Group - Marion Plant: 1.9 → 4.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.8× in 2023

Prysmian Group - Marion Plant's TCR rose 2.5 from 1.9 in 2022 to 4.4 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335929 · Marion, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 95% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #6/8
  • PHOTO Prysmian Cables and …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~158 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Prysmian Group - Marion Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prysmian Group - Marion Plant averages 3.1 TCR (95% of the Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prysmian Group - Marion Plant TCR series: 2022=1.9 · 2023=4.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Prysmian Group - Marion Plant falls in its industry

144 Cable, nonferrous, insulated, establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 8 Cable, nonferrous, insulated, employers in Indiana.

Prysmian Group - Marion Plant (158 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Prysmian Group - Marion Plant
Prysmian Group - Marion Plant (158 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Prysmian Group - Marion Plant has more employees than the Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.4 2.5 7 0 0
2022 1.9 0.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335929 · IN · Marion

144 Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 81 employers in Marion, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR US056B: ACS Unit 1 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Draka Cableteq USA 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orangeburg - Cable Plant 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Midwestern Electric LLC 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kerry-Evansville 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jet Technologies, Inc. 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ottenweller Company, Inc. Fort Wayne Headquarters 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana Wesleyan University 4,342 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marion Health 1,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marion Metal Center 1,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marion Stamping, General Motors 864 FTE
NAT-TCR ValuCheck #149 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Thomas Building Center, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR International Wire - Continental Cortadge 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR IMI Woodstock 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mco - Dhl 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eastern Const/Field Services - Bld: 5361 - 01 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mt. Greylock Extended Care Facility 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walters & Wolf Precast 158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.