Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground · South Carolina

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC

Lexington, SC · ~61 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC runs at 107% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground workplace, earning a grade C.

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC: 3.0 TCR = 107% of Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC safety composite

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2017→2018

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC injury rate improved

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC's TCR fell 2.7 from 4.3 in 2017 to 1.7 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.3 · 2018=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Lexington, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 107% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/16
  • PHOTO 900
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 900 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC averages 3.0 TCR (107% of the Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC TCR series: 2017=4.3 · 2018=1.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC falls in its industry

1,605 Cable laying (e.g., cable tele establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 16 Cable laying (e.g., cable tele employers in South Carolina.

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC (61 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC
Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC (61 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC has fewer employees than the Cable laying (e.g., cable television, el median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2017 4.3 2.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · SC · Lexington

1,605 Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 136 employers in Lexington, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 900 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FairWind, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR HMI Communications, LLC - Lewisville, TX 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Electric Division 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE CLOVER SC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE 861-SC-Midlands 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE CR Hipp Construction Inc. 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thompson Industrial Services, LLC, Division 33 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Lexington 1,630 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michelin US5 Lexington SC 1,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michelin North America US7 838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbia 760 FTE
NAT-TCR Greenhills Health and Rehabilitation 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Canton Sales & Storage 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Conyers Service Center 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Seaside Waikiki Hotel 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hebron, Ky Branch 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minneapolis Plate Division 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Microtyping Systems 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Terex Services - Waukesha 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.