Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Nevada

PSL-The Chateau at Gardnerville

Gardnerville, NV · ~52 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PSL-The Chateau at Gardnerville runs at 252% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

PSL-The Chateau at Gardnerville: 9.6 TCR = 252% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PSL-The Chateau at Gardnerville safety composite

PSL-The Chateau at Gardnerville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

PSL-The Chateau at Gardnerville: 1.4 → 6.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 21.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.63× in 2024

PSL-The Chateau at Gardnerville's TCR rose 4.7 from 1.4 in 2022 to 6.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 21.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Gardnerville, NV ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.6 · 252% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #37/52
  • PHOTO SHI-II Warwick, LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SHI-II Warwick, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

PSL-The Chateau at Gardnerville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PSL-The Chateau at Gardnerville averages 9.6 TCR (252% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PSL-The Chateau at Gardnerville TCR series: 2022=1.4 · 2023=21.2 · 2024=6.1 · BLS 3.8

Where PSL-The Chateau at Gardnerville falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nevada alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 52 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Nevada.

PSL-The Chateau at Gardnerville (52 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate PSL-The Chateau at Gardnerville
PSL-The Chateau at Gardnerville (52 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

PSL-The Chateau at Gardnerville has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.1 6.1 2 0 0
2023 21.2 18.2 7 0 0
2022 1.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NV · Gardnerville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 13 employers in Gardnerville, NV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SHI-II Warwick, LLC 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR HSL 14, LLC 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Tequesta MC 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3457-07 WESTERN RESERVE MASONIC COMMUNITY, IN 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Las Vegas Division Office 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE GMCONSTRUCTION LLC 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mesa - Nevada 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunrise Air Systems Inc. 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5864 252 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5864 250 FTE
CITY-NEAR 706-00389 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aervoe Industries Incorporated 94 FTE
NAT-TCR PSMLV INC, t/a Penn Sheet Metal 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Haven Convalescent Home, Inc 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lancaster Metal Manufacturing, LLC 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Diamond Forest Resources 9.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Spring Arbor Cottage of Salisbury 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #1662 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northgate Plaza 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arizona Electrical Apparatus Inc. 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.