Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · Pennsylvania

PSMLV INC, t/a Penn Sheet Metal

Allentown, PA · ~21 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PSMLV INC, t/a Penn Sheet Metal runs at 290% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

PSMLV INC, t/a Penn Sheet Metal: 9.6 TCR = 290% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PSMLV INC, t/a Penn Sheet Metal safety composite

PSMLV INC, t/a Penn Sheet Metal scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

PSMLV INC, t/a Penn Sheet Metal: 0.0 → 9.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 19.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.97× in 2024

PSMLV INC, t/a Penn Sheet Metal's TCR rose 9.3 from 0.0 in 2022 to 9.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 19.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Allentown, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.6 · 290% of ind

  • DART 9.3 DART
  • RANK #58/68
  • PHOTO Lancaster Metal Manu…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lancaster Metal Manufacturing, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

PSMLV INC, t/a Penn Sheet Metal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PSMLV INC, t/a Penn Sheet Metal averages 9.6 TCR (290% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PSMLV INC, t/a Penn Sheet Metal TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=19.4 · 2024=9.3 · BLS 3.3

Where PSMLV INC, t/a Penn Sheet Metal falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #58 safest of 68 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in Pennsylvania.

PSMLV INC, t/a Penn Sheet Metal (21 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate PSMLV INC, t/a Penn Sheet Metal
PSMLV INC, t/a Penn Sheet Metal (21 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

PSMLV INC, t/a Penn Sheet Metal has fewer employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.3 9.3 2 0 0
2023 19.4 6.5 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · PA · Allentown

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 447 employers in Allentown, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lancaster Metal Manufacturing, LLC 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Austin Mohawk and Company LLC 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR M&M METALS 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Qualex Manufacturing at Ridgeway, SC 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Smiling Porker 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE STgenetics-PA Dairy 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE LUMA, Carolina Hangar 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Frackville 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lehigh Valley Hospital 9,463 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1200SCC 6,531 FTE
CITY-NEAR Air Products and Chemicals Inc.- Main Campus 2,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR LOCATION 48042 1,728 FTE
NAT-TCR Diamond Forest Resources 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR PSL-The Chateau at Gardnerville 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Precast - GA Plant 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hsl 14, LLC 9.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Haven Grain Elevator 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arizona City 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4020 Hillsborough Community College 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Evergreen Village Markets LLC- RAYMOND LOCATION 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.