Engineering research and development laboratories or services · Oregon

PVE C2 - Product Validation Engineering

Portland, OR · ~26 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PVE C2 - Product Validation Engineering runs at 342% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Engineering research and development laboratories or services workplace, earning a grade F.

PVE C2 - Product Validation Engineering: 1.7 TCR = 342% of Engineering research and development laboratories or services BLS 0.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PVE C2 - Product Validation Engineering safety composite

PVE C2 - Product Validation Engineering scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

PVE C2 - Product Validation Engineering held a steady TCR band

PVE C2 - Product Validation Engineering's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.0 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Portland, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 1.7 · 342% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/10
  • PHOTO EVERSANA Life Scienc…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EVERSANA Life Science Services LLC - Memphis, TN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

PVE C2 - Product Validation Engineering in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PVE C2 - Product Validation Engineering averages 1.7 TCR (342% of the Engineering research and development laboratories or services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PVE C2 - Product Validation Engineering TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.5

Where PVE C2 - Product Validation Engineering falls in its industry

319 Engineering research and devel establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 10 Engineering research and devel employers in Oregon.

PVE C2 - Product Validation Engineering (26 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate PVE C2 - Product Validation Engineering
PVE C2 - Product Validation Engineering (26 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

PVE C2 - Product Validation Engineering has fewer employees than the Engineering research and development lab median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.1 2.6 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · OR · Portland

319 Engineering research and development laboratories or services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EVERSANA Life Science Services LLC - Memphis, TN 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Imiloa Astronomy Center of HI 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Topography Health, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silicon Mountain Contract Svcs 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Greenhouses 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lochmead Farms 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shiloh Forestry, Inc. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Millersburg 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Terra Pave, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Real Alloy Specification, LLC - Wabash, IN 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Jacksonville 10251 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dedicated Anheuser-Busch 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Issaquah WA Truss 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 1497 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wylar - Laramie 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mnbrk - Rpf 16 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.