Industrial research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) · Idaho

Silicon Mountain Contract Svcs

Nampa, ID · ~80 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Silicon Mountain Contract Svcs runs at 336% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Industrial research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) workplace, earning a grade F.

Silicon Mountain Contract Svcs: 1.7 TCR = 336% of Industrial research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Silicon Mountain Contract Svcs safety composite

Silicon Mountain Contract Svcs scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Silicon Mountain Contract Svcs: 0.0 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.4 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2023

Silicon Mountain Contract Svcs's TCR rose 3.4 from 0.0 in 2022 to 3.4 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Nampa, ID ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 1.7 · 336% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK P24
  • PHOTO PVE C2 - Product Val…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PVE C2 - Product Validation Engineering (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

Silicon Mountain Contract Svcs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Silicon Mountain Contract Svcs averages 1.7 TCR (336% of the Industrial research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Silicon Mountain Contract Svcs TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=3.4 · BLS 0.5

Where Silicon Mountain Contract Svcs falls in its industry

319 Industrial research and develo establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Silicon Mountain Contract Svcs (80 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Silicon Mountain Contract Svcs
Silicon Mountain Contract Svcs (80 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Silicon Mountain Contract Svcs has fewer employees than the Industrial research and development labo median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · ID · Nampa

319 Industrial research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 228 employers in Nampa, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PVE C2 - Product Validation Engineering 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10 Tyler Street 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR EVERSANA Life Science Services LLC - Memphis, TN 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corteva - Marion, IA 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corporate Offices 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seastrom Mfg. Co. Inc. 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE POCATELLO (IDPOA) 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boise 268 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BOI2 2,940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Alphonsus Medical Center, Nampa (Garrity)-SAHS-ID/OR 1,047 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Alphonsus Medical Center Nampa 922 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lactalis Nampa 863 FTE
NAT-TCR Hamilton-Airgas Safety 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Livingston Street 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR New England Trim, Inc 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1177 LUZERNE, PA 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE California Deluxe Windows 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eastern Animal Hospital 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Environmental Landscape Development, Inc 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coaster-TX 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.