Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Pennsylvania

PWCampbell Contracting Co

Pittsburgh, PA · ~84 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PWCampbell Contracting Co runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade C.

PWCampbell Contracting Co: 2.7 TCR = 92% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PWCampbell Contracting Co safety composite

PWCampbell Contracting Co scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2020

PWCampbell Contracting Co injury rate improved

PWCampbell Contracting Co's TCR fell 1.4 from 2.6 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 92% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #108/251
  • PHOTO M&F LITTEKEN
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: M&F LITTEKEN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

PWCampbell Contracting Co in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PWCampbell Contracting Co averages 2.7 TCR (92% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PWCampbell Contracting Co TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=1.2 · BLS 2.9

Where PWCampbell Contracting Co falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #108 safest of 251 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Pennsylvania.

PWCampbell Contracting Co (84 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate PWCampbell Contracting Co
PWCampbell Contracting Co (84 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

PWCampbell Contracting Co has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2019 4.7 0.7 7 0 0
2018 2.2 0.0 3 0 0
2016 2.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · PA · Pittsburgh

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR M&F LITTEKEN 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Theodore Williams Construction Company, LLC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR McIntyre Elwell Strammer GC Inc 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SSD Contracting LLC 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE R.W. Sauder Inc 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilkinsburg B 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kriger Pipeline, Incorporatated 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Archbald 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Global Specialty Fulfillment : UCA6 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Rio Grande Medical Center 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites Carolina Beach - Oceanfront 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 971 Hollywood, Fl 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Intertape Polymer Group 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMI 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amcor Addison IL 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bioo Scientific 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.