Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in food science · Texas

Bioo Scientific

Austin, TX · ~84 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bioo Scientific runs at 282% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in food science workplace, earning a grade F.

Bioo Scientific: 1.4 TCR = 282% of Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in food science BLS 0.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bioo Scientific safety composite

Bioo Scientific scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bioo Scientific: 1.4 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 3.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.5× in 2020

Bioo Scientific's TCR rose 1.8 from 1.4 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541711 · Austin, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 1.4 · 282% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Central Research
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Central Research (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Bioo Scientific in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bioo Scientific averages 1.4 TCR (282% of the Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in food science BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bioo Scientific TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.2 · BLS 0.5

Where Bioo Scientific falls in its industry

189 Biotechnology research and dev establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Biotechnology research and dev employers in Texas.

Bioo Scientific (84 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 296 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bioo Scientific
Bioo Scientific (84 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 296 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Bioo Scientific has fewer employees than the Biotechnology research and development l median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.2 2.1 2 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2016 1.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541711 · TX · Austin

189 Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in food science employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Central Research 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR AbbVie Bay Area 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nexcelom Bioscience 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cargill Protein Wichita CIC 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE RGJC 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Burnett Ranches 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA Feedyard LP 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE FARMERS BRANCH OFFICE 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Roses Express 654 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Roses Express 1852 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CABAKE-OPI-BAKERSFIELD 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 1962 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Broward Hospice 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Intertape Polymer Group 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE PWCampbell Contracting Co 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bruns Building and Development and Ohio and Indiana Roofing 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.