Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) · South Carolina

Pyramid Charleston Tenant LLC

Charleston, SC · ~47 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pyramid Charleston Tenant LLC runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) workplace, earning a grade C.

Pyramid Charleston Tenant LLC: 2.9 TCR = 97% of Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pyramid Charleston Tenant LLC safety composite

Pyramid Charleston Tenant LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2022→2023

Pyramid Charleston Tenant LLC injury rate improved

Pyramid Charleston Tenant LLC's TCR fell 5.8 from 5.8 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=5.8 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Charleston, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 97% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #55/138
  • PHOTO Oak Tree Inn
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oak Tree Inn (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Pyramid Charleston Tenant LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pyramid Charleston Tenant LLC averages 2.9 TCR (97% of the Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Pyramid Charleston Tenant LLC TCR series: 2022=5.8 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Pyramid Charleston Tenant LLC falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #55 safest of 138 Hotel management services (i.e employers in South Carolina.

Pyramid Charleston Tenant LLC (47 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pyramid Charleston Tenant LLC
Pyramid Charleston Tenant LLC (47 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Pyramid Charleston Tenant LLC has fewer employees than the Hotel management services (i.e., providi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.8 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · SC · Charleston

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 341 employers in Charleston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oak Tree Inn 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites Colorado Springs-Air Force Academy-I-25 North 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holiday Inn Crystal River 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alida 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Inverness at Spartanburg 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Myrtle Beach Grove Senior Living 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chandler Place Assisted Living and Memory Care 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Myrtle Beach Airport - MYR 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical University Hospital Authority 8,204 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical University of South Carolina 5,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC-03 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAFETY MANAGEMENT DIVISION 1,790 FTE
NAT-TCR Holman Logistics K2 Kent 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR PWD-Buffalo, LLC 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR North Texas Medical Center 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Toms River Police Department 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Supply Source Enterprises-Richmond, IN 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE City Lights Ltd 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pizza Blends Inc - Portland 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE ATL Construction Inc 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.