Air-Conditioning and Warm Air Heating Equipment and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing · Florida

Q-PAC Systems

Elkton, FL · ~66 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Q-PAC Systems runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Air-Conditioning and Warm Air Heating Equipment and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Q-PAC Systems: 1.6 TCR = 48% of Air-Conditioning and Warm Air Heating Equipment and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Q-PAC Systems safety composite

Q-PAC Systems scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Q-PAC Systems: 0.0 → 1.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.83× in 2024

Q-PAC Systems's TCR rose 1.3 from 0.0 in 2022 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333415 · Elkton, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 48% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #5/20
  • PHOTO Transport Solutions …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Transport Solutions Americas : MFG-Hastings, NE-USA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Q-PAC Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Q-PAC Systems averages 1.6 TCR (48% of the Air-Conditioning and Warm Air Heating Equipment and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Q-PAC Systems TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Q-PAC Systems falls in its industry

461 Air-Conditioning and Warm Air establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 20 Air-Conditioning and Warm Air employers in Florida.

Q-PAC Systems (66 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Q-PAC Systems
Q-PAC Systems (66 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Q-PAC Systems has fewer employees than the Air-Conditioning and Warm Air Heating Eq median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2023 3.4 1.7 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333415 · FL · Elkton

461 Air-Conditioning and Warm Air Heating Equipment and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 4 employers in Elkton, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Transport Solutions Americas : MFG-Hastings, NE-USA 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR TN Facility-KPS Global 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Johnson Controls Inc Albany 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Packless Metal Hose 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Green Bean Packers, Inc. 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE PPE Plant Port Everglades 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE MTN STN STU Storeroom 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clark Service Center 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elkton Distribution Center 211 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jacksonville IMC 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR L&M Warehouse & Packing of North Florida LLC-Elkton 1 FTE
NAT-TCR Sarver 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ASC Parent Company 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Environmental Solutions Chicago 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Great Plains Beef 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nipro PharmaPackaging Americas 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Authentic Brands of Chicago, LLC 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greene Machine and Manufacturing, Inc. 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE JC Logistics 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.