Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale · Oklahoma

QT Kitchens - Tulsa

Tulsa, OK · ~94 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.4
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

QT Kitchens - Tulsa runs at 522% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale workplace, earning a grade F.

QT Kitchens - Tulsa: 21.4 TCR = 522% of Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale BLS 4.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

QT Kitchens - Tulsa safety composite

QT Kitchens - Tulsa scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 20.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2017→2023

QT Kitchens - Tulsa injury rate improved

QT Kitchens - Tulsa's TCR fell 1.2 from 23.3 in 2017 to 22.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 34.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=23.3 · 2018=14.9 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=34.8 · 2022=25.6 · 2023=22.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311991 · Tulsa, OK ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.4 · 522% of ind

  • DART 20.3 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Gourmet Fresh Pasta,…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 85 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gourmet Fresh Pasta, Inc. (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

QT Kitchens - Tulsa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows QT Kitchens - Tulsa averages 21.4 TCR (522% of the Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

QT Kitchens - Tulsa TCR series: 2017=23.3 · 2018=14.9 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=34.8 · 2022=25.6 · 2023=22.2 · BLS 4.1

Where QT Kitchens - Tulsa falls in its industry

376 Food, prepared, perishable, pa establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Food, prepared, perishable, pa employers in Oklahoma.

QT Kitchens - Tulsa (94 employees, TCR 21.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate QT Kitchens - Tulsa
QT Kitchens - Tulsa (94 employees, TCR 21.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1

QT Kitchens - Tulsa has fewer employees than the Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 22.2 20.3 12 0 0
2022 25.6 21.7 11 2 0
2021 34.8 27.0 18 0 0
2020 7.7 4.6 5 0 0
2018 14.9 14.9 14 0 0
2017 23.3 21.5 25 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311991 · OK · Tulsa

376 Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,004 employers in Tulsa, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gourmet Fresh Pasta, Inc. 21.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR URDC 21.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1 23.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fullerton, CA factory 18.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE QPS Flint, LLC 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE SPECIALTY BAKERY OF TULSA 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper - Oklahoma City Container 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vox Printing 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. 6,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR H&P IDC - U.S. Land 6,014 FTE
CITY-NEAR TUL-TULSA-MAINTENANCE BASE 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-TUL-TULSA-TUL-TRML 4,794 FTE
NAT-TCR Advantage Veterans Services 21.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Arrowhead Plastic Engineering, Inc. 21.4 TCR
NAT-TCR NHC Springfield 21.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Crown Plastics Inc 21.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Home Resources Inc 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ken Graham Trucking 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Benton Stearns Education District 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elmwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.