Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Arkansas

Quaddra Logistics LLC

Alexander, AR · ~56 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
20.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quaddra Logistics LLC runs at 309% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Quaddra Logistics LLC: 20.1 TCR = 309% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quaddra Logistics LLC safety composite

Quaddra Logistics LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 20.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.1

2022→2024

Quaddra Logistics LLC injury rate improved

Quaddra Logistics LLC's TCR fell 8.1 from 18.6 in 2022 to 10.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 31.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=18.6 · 2023=31.1 · 2024=10.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Alexander, AR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 20.1 · 309% of ind

  • DART 10.5 DART
  • RANK #68/70
  • PHOTO Wildebeest Delivery
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wildebeest Delivery (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Quaddra Logistics LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quaddra Logistics LLC averages 20.1 TCR (309% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quaddra Logistics LLC TCR series: 2022=18.6 · 2023=31.1 · 2024=10.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Quaddra Logistics LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #68 safest of 70 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Arkansas.

Quaddra Logistics LLC (56 employees, TCR 20.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Quaddra Logistics LLC
Quaddra Logistics LLC (56 employees, TCR 20.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Quaddra Logistics LLC has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.5 10.5 5 0 0
2023 31.1 9.6 13 0 0
2022 18.6 18.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · AR · Alexander

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 12 employers in Alexander, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wildebeest Delivery 20.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apex Deliveries Inc. 20.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MOCHI - CHILLICOTHE 20.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TVLY 20.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE TCM Enterprises, LLC 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thompson Electric 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pappas Foods 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ouachita Brick Plant 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Little Rock Branch 240 FTE
CITY-NEAR Little Rock 175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Whiting Systems, Inc. 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Whiting Systems, Inc. Alexander 88 FTE
NAT-TCR Drop N' Go Deliveries 20.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Wildebeest Delivery 20.1 TCR
NAT-TCR NHC HealthCare Lewisburg 20.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Nittobo America Inc. - ME 20.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Superior Roofing Services 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Latta Road Nursing Home East 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE realwheels corporation 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunnyside Corporation 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.