Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona

Quail Park at Morrison Ranch

Gilbert, AZ · ~64 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quail Park at Morrison Ranch runs at 421% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Quail Park at Morrison Ranch: 16.0 TCR = 421% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quail Park at Morrison Ranch safety composite

Quail Park at Morrison Ranch scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.0

2018→2021

Quail Park at Morrison Ranch injury rate improved

Quail Park at Morrison Ranch's TCR fell 16.0 from 22.8 in 2018 to 6.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 22.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=22.8 · 2019=20.3 · 2020=14.2 · 2021=6.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Gilbert, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.0 · 421% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #152/173
  • PHOTO Villa Redondo
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Villa Redondo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Quail Park at Morrison Ranch in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quail Park at Morrison Ranch averages 16.0 TCR (421% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quail Park at Morrison Ranch TCR series: 2018=22.8 · 2019=20.3 · 2020=14.2 · 2021=6.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Quail Park at Morrison Ranch falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #152 safest of 173 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Quail Park at Morrison Ranch (64 employees, TCR 16.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Quail Park at Morrison Ranch
Quail Park at Morrison Ranch (64 employees, TCR 16.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Quail Park at Morrison Ranch has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 6.8 1.7 4 0 0
2020 14.2 11.0 9 0 0
2019 20.3 12.9 11 0 0
2018 22.8 22.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AZ · Gilbert

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 261 employers in Gilbert, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Villa Redondo 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Suffolk Operations, LLC 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Royal Columbian Retirement Inn 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hampshire Manor 16.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tofel Dent Construction 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southwest Concrete Paving Co. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALK Asphalt, LLC 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Solar Gain Inc 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030512 1,613 FTE
CITY-NEAR Town of Gilbert 1,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030512-512001 1,286 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-512 911 FTE
NAT-TCR Encinitas Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 2429 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR LQ7709 Miami Lakes 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Camp Red Cedar 16.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Greensboro, NC HVAC 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Distribution Center 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Car Rental - 36N1 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE US194: Richmond 252 - SG 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.