Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Quail Park on Cypress

Visalia, CA · ~90 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quail Park on Cypress runs at 238% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Quail Park on Cypress: 9.1 TCR = 238% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quail Park on Cypress safety composite

Quail Park on Cypress scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Quail Park on Cypress: 11.6 → 20.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 20.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.14× in 2024

Quail Park on Cypress's TCR rose 9.2 from 11.6 in 2017 to 20.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Visalia, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.1 · 238% of ind

  • DART 10.4 DART
  • RANK #310/635
  • PHOTO Ridgeview Assisted L…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ridgeview Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Quail Park on Cypress in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quail Park on Cypress averages 9.1 TCR (238% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quail Park on Cypress TCR series: 2017=11.6 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=18.6 · 2022=11.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=20.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Quail Park on Cypress falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #310 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Quail Park on Cypress (90 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Quail Park on Cypress
Quail Park on Cypress (90 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Quail Park on Cypress has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 20.7 10.4 14 2 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 11.2 2.5 6 3 0
2021 18.6 5.0 14 1 0
2020 4.3 4.3 4 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.1 0.0 4 0 0
2017 11.6 7.7 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Visalia

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 349 employers in Visalia, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ridgeview Assisted Living 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Oaks 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Management GTHI NorBella Champlin 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale North Oaks 9.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE HM Clause - Davis West Research Station 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holland America Flowers, LLC 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hettinga - California 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE A & R Contracting 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kaweah Delta Health Care District 4,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paragon Personnel 2,129 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 194 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 473 1,479 FTE
NAT-TCR Great River Care Center 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Irondale Post Acute 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Baptist Medical Center East 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Village on the Green 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE R&R Delivery Service LLC 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Simpson Meadows 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Performance Fire Protection LLC 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE busch products inc 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.