Retirement communities, continuing care · California

The Foothills at Simi Valley

Simi Valley, CA · ~90 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
24.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Foothills at Simi Valley runs at 635% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade F.

The Foothills at Simi Valley: 24.1 TCR = 635% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Foothills at Simi Valley safety composite

The Foothills at Simi Valley scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 24.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2017→2022

The Foothills at Simi Valley injury rate improved

The Foothills at Simi Valley's TCR fell 3.7 from 17.1 in 2017 to 13.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 39.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=17.1 · 2018=17.8 · 2019=20.2 · 2020=39.2 · 2021=37.2 · 2022=13.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Simi Valley, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 24.1 · 635% of ind

  • DART 13.4 DART
  • RANK #208/216
  • PHOTO Maplewood at Twinsburg
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 64 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maplewood at Twinsburg (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

The Foothills at Simi Valley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Foothills at Simi Valley averages 24.1 TCR (635% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Foothills at Simi Valley TCR series: 2017=17.1 · 2018=17.8 · 2019=20.2 · 2020=39.2 · 2021=37.2 · 2022=13.4 · BLS 3.8

Where The Foothills at Simi Valley falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #208 safest of 216 Retirement communities, contin employers in California.

The Foothills at Simi Valley (90 employees, TCR 24.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015202530 Average employees Total Case Rate The Foothills at Simi Valley
The Foothills at Simi Valley (90 employees, TCR 24.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Foothills at Simi Valley has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 13.4 13.4 3 2 0
2021 37.2 34.3 8 18 0
2020 39.2 35.5 11 10 0
2019 20.2 13.8 19 0 0
2018 17.8 14.2 11 4 0
2017 17.1 10.0 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Simi Valley

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 139 employers in Simi Valley, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maplewood at Twinsburg 24.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sheffield Manor 24.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maison Bienvenue 24.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emerald Springs Senior Living 24.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE HM Clause - Davis West Research Station 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holland America Flowers, LLC 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hettinga - California 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE A & R Contracting 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc. 563 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9292-AHSV001 - HOSPITAL 555 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Simi Valley 520 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milgard Manufacturing Simi Valley CA 511 FTE
NAT-TCR Highline Rehabilitation and Care Community 24.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0554 24.1 TCR
NAT-TCR OrePac Building Products - Bozeman 24.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ludlowe Center for health & rehab 24.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Columbia Rehabilitation adn Health at Nexion 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crowne Plaza Atlanta Midtown 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parsec Columbus 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pls, LLC 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.