General warehousing and storage · Utah

Quality Distribution, Inc

Salt Lake City, UT · ~55 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quality Distribution, Inc runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Quality Distribution, Inc: 2.0 TCR = 35% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quality Distribution, Inc safety composite

Quality Distribution, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2017→2024

Quality Distribution, Inc injury rate improved

Quality Distribution, Inc's TCR fell 1.4 from 3.0 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Salt Lake City, UT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.0 · 35% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #22/89
  • PHOTO 9247 Meridan Way Wes…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 9247 Meridan Way West Chester OH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Quality Distribution, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quality Distribution, Inc averages 2.0 TCR (35% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quality Distribution, Inc TCR series: 2017=3 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 5.8

Where Quality Distribution, Inc falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 89 General warehousing and storag employers in Utah.

Quality Distribution, Inc (55 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Quality Distribution, Inc
Quality Distribution, Inc (55 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Quality Distribution, Inc has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 7.7 2.6 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.0 3.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · UT · Salt Lake City

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 998 employers in Salt Lake City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 9247 Meridan Way West Chester OH 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1623 GEODIS LOGISTICS 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Capacity LLC - C5 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR WM 3365 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Destination Homes 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Salt Lake City Branch 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE High Country Line Construction, Inc. 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Craghead Building Company 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - SLC 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PC - Primary Childrens Hospital 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Technologies, Inc. 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salt Lake City Terminal 2,766 FTE
NAT-TCR Occhino Corp 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyard Houston Intercontinental Airport 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Park Construction of NC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pal Environmental Services 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Millwood, Inc. Hamilton 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE CL Healthcare 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unitek Facility 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mountain Parks Electric, Inc Granby 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.