Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing · Wisconsin

Quality Liquid Feeds Inc

Dodgeville, WI · ~221 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.9
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quality Liquid Feeds Inc runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Quality Liquid Feeds Inc: 4.8 TCR = 123% of Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing BLS 3.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quality Liquid Feeds Inc safety composite

Quality Liquid Feeds Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 48% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2016→2023

Quality Liquid Feeds Inc injury rate improved

Quality Liquid Feeds Inc's TCR fell 5.5 from 8.9 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.9 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311119 · Dodgeville, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 123% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #35/53
  • PHOTO Highland Premix Plant
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 83 inj
  • SIZE ~221 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Highland Premix Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Quality Liquid Feeds Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quality Liquid Feeds Inc averages 4.8 TCR (123% of the Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quality Liquid Feeds Inc TCR series: 2016=8.9 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=4 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=3.4 · BLS 3.9

Where Quality Liquid Feeds Inc falls in its industry

756 Animal feed mills (except dog establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 53 Animal feed mills (except dog employers in Wisconsin.

Quality Liquid Feeds Inc (221 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Quality Liquid Feeds Inc
Quality Liquid Feeds Inc (221 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Quality Liquid Feeds Inc has more employees than the Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.4 1.7 8 0 1
2022 5.3 3.1 12 0 0
2021 4.0 1.2 9 1 0
2020 2.3 1.5 6 0 0
2019 4.8 2.6 11 0 0
2018 4.9 2.7 11 0 0
2017 4.8 2.6 11 0 0
2016 8.9 4.2 15 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311119 · WI · Dodgeville

756 Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 25 employers in Dodgeville, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Highland Premix Plant 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fremont Purina Feed Mill 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marshville Bakery Feeds 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pharmgate-Omaha 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Michels Road & Stone-WI-Brownsville 221 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nicolet Mill 221 FTE
STATE-SIZE Independent Printing Co Inc 221 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAYSUN CORPORATION 221 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dodgeville 2,840 FTE
CITY-NEAR Upland Hills Health - Hospital 420 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 847 277 FTE
CITY-NEAR 847 250 FTE
NAT-TCR Parts Authority Bellmore 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 1204 - Van Buren Township Mi (Wet) Depot 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 202 - Atlanta 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Logis, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0267 - Morris Il (Dry) Depot 221 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beaumont Juice, Inc. 221 FTE
NAT-SIZE Veltek Associates, Inc. 221 FTE
NAT-SIZE Location 64 221 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.