Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing · West Virginia

Quality Machine Co Inc

Bridgeport, WV · ~36 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quality Machine Co Inc runs at 107% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Quality Machine Co Inc: 3.5 TCR = 107% of Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quality Machine Co Inc safety composite

Quality Machine Co Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Quality Machine Co Inc: 2.4 → 5.4 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 7.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Quality Machine Co Inc's TCR rose 3.0 from 2.4 in 2016 to 5.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332313 · Bridgeport, WV ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 107% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P60
  • PHOTO J.C. Industries, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: J.C. Industries, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · West Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Quality Machine Co Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quality Machine Co Inc averages 3.5 TCR (107% of the Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quality Machine Co Inc TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=6.5 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.2 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=5.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Quality Machine Co Inc falls in its industry

449 Plate work (e.g., bending, cut establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Quality Machine Co Inc (36 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Quality Machine Co Inc
Quality Machine Co Inc (36 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Quality Machine Co Inc has fewer employees than the Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.4 0.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.9 0.0 2 2 0
2017 6.5 2.1 3 0 0
2016 2.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332313 · WV · Bridgeport

449 Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,269 rated employers in West Virginia with headcount on file · 55 employers in Bridgeport, WV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR J.C. Industries, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boardman LLC 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bloom Engineering Company Inc 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR IME Industrial Metal Enterprises, LLC 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE MudMasters 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milton Ofc and Svc Ctr 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Feed Mill 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Twin River Hardwoods, INC 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Hospital Center 2,362 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Thrasher Group 492 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHI RJ Aviation Inc. - West Virginia Air Center 470 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pratt & Whitney Engine Services, Inc. (Plant 81) 452 FTE
NAT-TCR 975 Lutter Drive 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Chalfont 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Fisher Auto Parts - NEWPKY 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Czarnowski-Utah/St. George 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 030/Arlington 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE 067/Tampa 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE 073/Oak Brook 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Imagineering, Inc. 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.