Processed meats manufacturing · Nebraska

Quality Processing Services Omaha

Name: Quality Processing Services Omaha Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Omaha, NE · ~47 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 25.7
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quality Processing Services Omaha runs at 778% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Processed meats manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Quality Processing Services Omaha: 25.7 TCR = 778% of Processed meats manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quality Processing Services Omaha safety composite

Quality Processing Services Omaha scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 25.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers
DART rate: F 3.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−34.3

2016→2017

Quality Processing Services Omaha injury rate improved

Quality Processing Services Omaha's TCR fell 34.3 from 60.0 in 2016 to 25.7 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 60.0 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=60.0 · 2017=25.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311612 · Omaha, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 25.7 · 778% of ind

DART 3.7 DART
RANK #29/29
PHOTO empirical foods, inc…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 28 inj
SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: empirical foods, inc. - Lexington (0.6 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

This site

25.7
empirical food

25.1
4L Processing

22.1
Columbia Case

19.6
Hastings Foods

17.9

What this shows Quality Processing Services Omaha averages 25.7 TCR (778% of the Processed meats manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Quality Processing Services Omaha TCR series: 2016=60 · 2017=25.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Quality Processing Services Omaha falls in its industry

613 Processed meats manufacturing establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 29 Processed meats manufacturing employers in Nebraska.

Quality Processing Services Omaha (47 employees, TCR 25.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Quality Processing Services Omaha has fewer employees than the Processed meats manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2017	25.7	3.7	14	0	0
2016	60.0	0.0	14	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311612 · NE · Omaha

613 Processed meats manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 1,135 employers in Omaha, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	empirical foods, inc. - Lexington	LEXINGTON, NE	25.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	4L Processing	COMO, TX	22.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Columbia Case Ready	COLUMBIA, SC	19.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Hastings Foods LLC	GRAND ISLAND, NE	17.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Jung Electric Service	LINCOLN	47 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Mid-Plains Insulation	OMAHA	47 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Brandt Excavating LLC	LINCOLN, NE	47 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Fremont Purina Feed Mill	FREMONT	47 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Drivers Management LLC/Over the Road Drivers	Omaha	9,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Nebraska Medicine	Omaha	8,728 FTE
CITY-NEAR	FUSION MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC	Omaha	2,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR	61830001 METHODIST HOSPITAL	Omaha	2,861 FTE
NAT-TCR	Northwest Confections Illinois, LLC	Pekin, IL	25.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Pet Supplies Plus LLC	S, IN	25.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	6458-ZLAS	Henderson, NV	25.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	McCoys Building Supply-Brenham	Brenham, TX	25.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Davis Core & Pad INC.	Cave Spring, GA	47 FTE
NAT-SIZE	N and R of Miner Inc	Sikeston, MO	47 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Manheim Keystone Pennsylvania	Grantville, PA	47 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Regional Boat Maintenance Center-RBMC	Kingsland, GA	47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.