Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating · Michigan

Quantum Mold & Engineering, LLC

Sterling Heights, MI · ~55 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quantum Mold & Engineering, LLC runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating workplace, earning a grade C.

Quantum Mold & Engineering, LLC: 3.2 TCR = 97% of Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quantum Mold & Engineering, LLC safety composite

Quantum Mold & Engineering, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2020→2024

Quantum Mold & Engineering, LLC injury rate improved

Quantum Mold & Engineering, LLC's TCR fell 3.4 from 6.6 in 2020 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=6.6 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=3.0 · 2024=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325211 · Sterling Heights, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 97% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/31
  • PHOTO DSM Coatings
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DSM Coatings (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Quantum Mold & Engineering, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quantum Mold & Engineering, LLC averages 3.2 TCR (97% of the Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quantum Mold & Engineering, LLC TCR series: 2020=6.6 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=3 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Quantum Mold & Engineering, LLC falls in its industry

644 Plastics and synthetic resins establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 31 Plastics and synthetic resins employers in Michigan.

Quantum Mold & Engineering, LLC (55 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Quantum Mold & Engineering, LLC
Quantum Mold & Engineering, LLC (55 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Quantum Mold & Engineering, LLC has fewer employees than the Plastics and synthetic resins regenerati median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 0.0 2 0 0
2023 3.0 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 6.6 6.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325211 · MI · Sterling Heights

644 Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 195 employers in Sterling Heights, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DSM Coatings 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Joslyn Manufacturing Company, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Interplastic Corporation Hawthorne 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mikron Washington LLC 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6375_14893 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ludington Pump Storage 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buchanan Office Nuclear 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Three Mile Road Service Center 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sterling Heights Assembly Plant 5,783 FTE
CITY-NEAR STERLING PLNT 2,319 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sterling Stamping Plant 2,115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Conti, LLC 1,892 FTE
NAT-TCR Mid-City Steel LLC 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR JL Bryson, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Trilliant Food & Nutrition 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Indiana Department of Child Services - Putnam County 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Frewsburg Rest Home, Inc. 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winebow-NC 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hagerstown 151 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tom Sawyer Camps Inc. 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.