Etching metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade · Oregon

QuantumClean-Hillsboro

Hillsboro, OR · ~197 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

QuantumClean-Hillsboro runs at 111% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Etching metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade workplace, earning a grade C.

QuantumClean-Hillsboro: 3.6 TCR = 111% of Etching metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

QuantumClean-Hillsboro safety composite

QuantumClean-Hillsboro scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

QuantumClean-Hillsboro: 1.8 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.88× in 2020

QuantumClean-Hillsboro's TCR rose 1.5 from 1.8 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Hillsboro, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 111% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO Thermal Spray Soluti…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~197 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Thermal Spray Solutions LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

QuantumClean-Hillsboro in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows QuantumClean-Hillsboro averages 3.6 TCR (111% of the Etching metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

QuantumClean-Hillsboro TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=3.2 · BLS 3.3

Where QuantumClean-Hillsboro falls in its industry

646 Etching metals and metal produ establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Etching metals and metal produ employers in Oregon.

QuantumClean-Hillsboro (197 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate QuantumClean-Hillsboro
QuantumClean-Hillsboro (197 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

QuantumClean-Hillsboro has more employees than the Etching metals and metal products (excep median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.2 3.2 8 0 0
2019 3.5 3.1 7 1 0
2018 5.8 5.8 12 0 0
2017 3.9 3.5 9 0 0
2016 1.8 0.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · OR · Hillsboro

646 Etching metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 282 employers in Hillsboro, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Thermal Spray Solutions LLC 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR GALVANIZERS, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Division 15 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Houston Mfg 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Iseli Nursery 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE 402850-EUGENE OR P&DC 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE Siskiyou Community Health Center 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHMG Peace Harbor Clinics 197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ronler Acres Campus 11,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jones Farm Campus 7,114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aloha Campus 1,688 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hawthorn Farm Campus 1,638 FTE
NAT-TCR 6784 Mercy Rehab Hosp Springfield 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Emory Ortho and Spine Hospital 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Children's Behavioral Health (CBHI) Haverhill 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR S09190 - Florida Training Center 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tradesmen International Washington DC 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE Loews Atlanta Hotel 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michels Gas Distribution- Rogers, MN 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant 36-37 197 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.