Etching metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade · California

QuantumClean-San Jose

San Jose, CA · ~41 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

QuantumClean-San Jose runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Etching metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade workplace, earning a grade A.

QuantumClean-San Jose: 0.9 TCR = 27% of Etching metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

QuantumClean-San Jose safety composite

QuantumClean-San Jose scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

QuantumClean-San Jose held a steady TCR band

QuantumClean-San Jose's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · San Jose, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/29
  • PHOTO PST Thermal Spray Co…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PST Thermal Spray Consumables (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

QuantumClean-San Jose in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows QuantumClean-San Jose averages 0.9 TCR (27% of the Etching metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

QuantumClean-San Jose TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where QuantumClean-San Jose falls in its industry

646 Etching metals and metal produ establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 29 Etching metals and metal produ employers in California.

QuantumClean-San Jose (41 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate QuantumClean-San Jose
QuantumClean-San Jose (41 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

QuantumClean-San Jose has fewer employees than the Etching metals and metal products (excep median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2017 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · CA · San Jose

646 Etching metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PST Thermal Spray Consumables 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR STC Pewaukee 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Freedom Finishing Inc 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aalberts Surface Technologies 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O ORGANIC FARMING ADMINISTRATION 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Lindsay 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | IEW Enterprise 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE George Jackson Farms, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR Mankato Service Center 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR EHP-Butternut 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Louisa County Public Schools 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Kent Power Ohio 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Region 04 CCSR FL-GA 90-04-01-96 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Fun Center at Paige's Crossing Inc. 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Xanitos Laundry at Erlanger Medical Center 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vantage Equipment LLC, Syracuse Branch 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.