Hose couplings and fittings, fluid power, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Quick Coupling Division - Machining

Union City, PA · ~102 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quick Coupling Division - Machining runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Hose couplings and fittings, fluid power, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Quick Coupling Division - Machining: 1.4 TCR = 41% of Hose couplings and fittings, fluid power, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quick Coupling Division - Machining safety composite

Quick Coupling Division - Machining scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2016→2019

Quick Coupling Division - Machining injury rate improved

Quick Coupling Division - Machining's TCR fell 2.7 from 2.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.7 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332912 · Union City, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/8
  • PHOTO Fluid Connectors : U…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fluid Connectors : Union City MAIN (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Quick Coupling Division - Machining in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quick Coupling Division - Machining averages 1.4 TCR (41% of the Hose couplings and fittings, fluid power, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quick Coupling Division - Machining TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Quick Coupling Division - Machining falls in its industry

182 Hose couplings and fittings, f establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 8 Hose couplings and fittings, f employers in Pennsylvania.

Quick Coupling Division - Machining (102 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Quick Coupling Division - Machining
Quick Coupling Division - Machining (102 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Quick Coupling Division - Machining has more employees than the Hose couplings and fittings, fluid power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.7 0.9 1 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332912 · PA · Union City

182 Hose couplings and fittings, fluid power, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 10 employers in Union City, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fluid Connectors : Union City MAIN 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caterpillar Fluid Transfer Solutions - Menominee 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dynamic Sealing Technologies, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR EXAIR Corporation 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Verano PA CPG - Agri-Kind 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE McKee Management Associates, Inc. 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bakers Pittsburgh 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Structures Division 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fluid Connectors : Union City TITUS 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR AAH Acquisitions, LLC dba Snap-Tite Hose 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Molded Fiber Glass Union City 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Molded Fiber Glass 63 FTE
NAT-TCR Kale Trucking Inc. 786 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR MCCO-Marketing Contact Center Orlando (fka Orlando Referral Center) 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ashland LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Garden City Lw 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE CLARO / PRT - Bairoa 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trend Health and Rehab 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hardee Manor Healthcare Center 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madico - St. Pete 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.