Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Idaho

Quiet Man Logistics

Boise, ID · ~53 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quiet Man Logistics runs at 207% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Quiet Man Logistics: 13.4 TCR = 207% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quiet Man Logistics safety composite

Quiet Man Logistics scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.4

2023→2024

Quiet Man Logistics injury rate improved

Quiet Man Logistics's TCR fell 10.4 from 18.6 in 2023 to 8.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 18.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=18.6 · 2024=8.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Boise, ID ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.4 · 207% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #44/59
  • PHOTO 108
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 108 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

Quiet Man Logistics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quiet Man Logistics averages 13.4 TCR (207% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quiet Man Logistics TCR series: 2023=18.6 · 2024=8.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Quiet Man Logistics falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 59 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Idaho.

Quiet Man Logistics (53 employees, TCR 13.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Quiet Man Logistics
Quiet Man Logistics (53 employees, TCR 13.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Quiet Man Logistics has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.2 0.0 3 0 0
2023 18.6 9.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · ID · Boise

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 581 employers in Boise, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 108 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MEPOR - PORTLAND 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commitment Logistics LLC 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOUTHERN PINES CENTER (NCSOU) 13.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE FDC-Glenns Ferry 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seneca Foods Corporation 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Streamline Precision Contracting, LLC 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Champion Concrete Pumping, Inc. 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Boise Medical Center (Including MSTI) 10,034 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1-Boise Main Site 6,035 FTE
CITY-NEAR Micron Boise Site 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center 3,869 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Coronado 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 4over LLC - Sperry 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sullivan Supply 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fire Station #82 & Fire Training Center 13.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lincoln Park 10101 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Portage 10187 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rock Hill 10130 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elyria 10165 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.