Garage door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation · California

R & S Erection of Santa Clara County

San Jose, CA · ~20 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R & S Erection of Santa Clara County runs at 250% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Garage door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation workplace, earning a grade F.

R & S Erection of Santa Clara County: 7.0 TCR = 250% of Garage door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R & S Erection of Santa Clara County safety composite

R & S Erection of Santa Clara County scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2017→2018

R & S Erection of Santa Clara County injury rate improved

R & S Erection of Santa Clara County's TCR fell 4.0 from 9.0 in 2017 to 5.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.0 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.0 · 2018=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · San Jose, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.0 · 250% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #77/85
  • PHOTO Vertical Options Ele…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Vertical Options Elevator Services LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

R & S Erection of Santa Clara County in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R & S Erection of Santa Clara County averages 7.0 TCR (250% of the Garage door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

R & S Erection of Santa Clara County TCR series: 2017=9 · 2018=5 · BLS 2.8

Where R & S Erection of Santa Clara County falls in its industry

1,138 Garage door, commercial- or in establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #77 safest of 85 Garage door, commercial- or in employers in California.

R & S Erection of Santa Clara County (20 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate R & S Erection of Santa Clara County
R & S Erection of Santa Clara County (20 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

R & S Erection of Santa Clara County has fewer employees than the Garage door, commercial- or industrial-t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.0 5.0 1 0 0
2017 9.0 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · CA · San Jose

1,138 Garage door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Vertical Options Elevator Services LLC 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR D15 Chicago NI MOD 1515 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc. - Scott City 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Jobsites 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sills Farms, Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE F A Maggiore & Sons, LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE CALMEX CONTRACTING INC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Velvet Antler Ranch LLC 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR 0025 - Louisville East, Ky 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hartselle Center (Alhar) 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR McKee Foods Corporation-AZ 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR East Jordan Plastics Beaverton Facility 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Interstate Building Materials Inc 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kesler Tire Service Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE 43141h - Normal Il Pec 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE STL-SPUSA 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.